Is it actually converged, or just claimed to be?
Mint (fallforgemint), the shelf (fallforge-catalogue), the runtime (fallnode) and Veridia (fallforgecell) each stay independent, live products with their own gate — nothing here merges their code. This organ composes them the other way: it walks the hashes each artifact declares about its neighbour and says, precisely, whether the chain from a minted manifest to a shelf listing to a served node or a Veridia audit is unbroken — and if not, exactly where it breaks. Runs entirely in your browser.
Both demos use realistic example manifest/listing/ledger/department shapes — the same shapes fallforgemint, fallforge-catalogue, fallnode and Veridia’s kernels actually produce (proven against their real, current kernels before this page was built). Nothing here calls out to another domain.
Paste a fallforge-provenance receipt to re-check it offline — confirms nobody changed the verdict since it was issued.
Two nodes that always agree aren’t checking each other.
Once there’s more than one served node, two more questions matter: is a pair of nodes soundly coupled — balanced, and disagreeing sometimes — or is one carrying the other, or are they just correlated (a merged pair that always agrees proves nothing)? And when several nodes share one frontier fallback, has any single node drained the budget on everyone’s behalf?
This proves the links between already-gated artifacts are unbroken — the hash a downstream artifact declares about its neighbour actually matches. It does not re-derive that any one product’s own logic is correct; each product’s own mutation gate already proves that. shelved ≤ served/audited — a node can be minted and shelved with neither yet, and that is an honest state, not a failure.